Legislature(1999 - 2000)
2000-03-16 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2000-03-16 House Journal Page 2576 SB 176 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 176(RLS) "An Act permitting a physical fitness facility to limit public accommodation to only males or only females." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT 3DP 3NR 2452 SENATE ZERO FISCAL NOTE (GOV) 1/26/00 2453 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Croft and Halcro: Page 1, line 7, following "users." insert: "Public accommodation may be limited under this subsection only to those rooms in the facility that are primarily used for weight loss, aerobic, and other exercises, or for resistance weight training. Public accommodation may not be limited under this subsection to rooms in the facility primarily used for other purposes, including conference rooms, dining rooms, and taverns. This subsection does not apply to swimming pools or golf courses." 2000-03-16 House Journal Page 2577 SB 176 Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Rokeberg: Delete "taverns" Insert "premises licensed under AS 04.11" Representative Rokeberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 176(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 as amended YEAS: 32 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Smalley, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Coghill, Kohring, Ogan, Rokeberg Excused: Green Absent: Austerman, Grussendorf, Moses And so, Amendment No. 1 as amended was adopted. 2000-03-16 House Journal Page 2578 SB 176 Representative Foster moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 176(RLS) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSB 176(RLS) am H was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSSB 176(RLS) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 176(RLS) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill, Cowdery, Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Smalley, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Berkowitz, Kerttula, Ogan Excused: Green Absent: Grussendorf, Moses And so, CSSB 176(RLS) am H passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.